Skip to content

chore(bdba): Properly log response object in case of errors#866

Merged
8R0WNI3 merged 1 commit into
open-component-model:masterfrom
8R0WNI3:bdba
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

chore(bdba): Properly log response object in case of errors#866
8R0WNI3 merged 1 commit into
open-component-model:masterfrom
8R0WNI3:bdba

Conversation

@8R0WNI3

@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:


Signed-off-by: Jonas Brand (8R0WNI3) <j.brand@sap.com>
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 self-assigned this Jun 18, 2026
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 added the kind/chore chore, maintenance, etc. label Jun 18, 2026
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2026 09:12
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 added the area/ipcei Important Project of Common European Interest label Jun 18, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to 🔦 Needs Triage in Open Delivery Gear Jun 18, 2026
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 moved this from 🔦 Needs Triage to 🔍 Review in Open Delivery Gear Jun 18, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@8R0WNI3, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 56 minutes and 46 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 31cbf8fd-56de-4775-ad3a-d5292581eb9b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c363d7 and 3f704b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/bdba/client.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zkdev zkdev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 merged commit 207bd56 into open-component-model:master Jun 22, 2026
21 checks passed
@8R0WNI3 8R0WNI3 deleted the bdba branch June 22, 2026 07:35
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from 🔍 Review to 🍺 Done in Open Delivery Gear Jun 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/ipcei Important Project of Common European Interest kind/chore chore, maintenance, etc.

Projects

Status: 🍺 Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants